A Japanese court refuses to recognize the motherhood of a ‘trans’ woman -media



FILE PHOTO.  Reference image of two people holding hands next to an LGBTQ+ flag, outside the Sapporo District Court, in Hokkaido, northern Japan.  March 17, 2021. Kyodo/via REUTERS
FILE PHOTO. Reference image of two people holding hands next to an LGBTQ+ flag, outside the Sapporo District Court, in Hokkaido, northern Japan. March 17, 2021. Kyodo/via REUTERS

TOKYO, Aug 19 (Reuters) – A Japanese court ruled on Friday that only the girl born before a ‘trans’ woman went through her surgical and legal transition can be legally recognized as her daughter, while the one born after her transition it can’t be, the media reported.

Japan, where many LGBTQ+ people are still not coming out to their families, requires anyone who wants to legally change their gender to undergo surgery to remove the sexual organs they were born with, a practice heavily criticized by LGBTQ advocacy groups. human rights.

The ‘trans’ woman, who was assigned the male gender at birth, had two daughters with her female partner using sperm preserved before her transition, the public broadcaster NHK and the Kyodo news agency reported.

Four years ago he was legally allowed to change gender on his family record, according to the reports.

Although her partner was recognized as the legal mother of the girls for having given birth to them, the ‘trans’ woman’s request to be recognized as a mother was not accepted by a Tokyo family court in February.

That court said “there is currently nothing in Japanese law that recognizes her parental rights,” a ruling the woman appealed.

On Friday, the Tokyo High Court ruled that she could be recognized as the mother of the daughter born before her legal gender change, but not of the second, born after.

No further details were immediately available.

Japan remains the only country in the Group of Seven that does not recognize same-sex marriage.

In June, a Japanese court ruled that a same-sex marriage ban is not unconstitutional, dealing a setback for LGBTQ+ rights after a 2021 court ruled otherwise.

(Reporting by Elaine Lies; edited in Spanish by Benjamín Mejías Valencia)





Source link


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *